翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Merdingen
・ Merdinli
・ Merdith W.B. Temple
・ Merdivenli
・ Merdja Sidi Abed
・ Merdjefare
・ Merdrignac
・ Merdzavan
・ Merdø
・ Merdžanići
・ Merdželat
・ Mere
・ Mere (album)
・ Mere (lake)
・ Mere (weapon)
Mere addition paradox
・ Mere Angne Mein
・ Mere Apne
・ Mere Baap Pehle Aap
・ Mere Bane Ki Baat Na Pucho
・ Mere Beck Meadows
・ Mere Bhaiya
・ Mere Brother Ki Dulhan
・ Mere Brow
・ Mere Christianity
・ Mere Contemplations
・ Mere Dad Ki Maruti
・ Mere Dead Men
・ Mere Do Anmol Ratan
・ Mere Dost Picture Abhi Baki Hai


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Mere addition paradox : ウィキペディア英語版
Mere addition paradox

The mere addition paradox, also known as the repugnant conclusion, is a problem in ethics, identified by Derek Parfit, and appearing in his book ''Reasons and Persons'' (1984). The paradox identifies an inconsistency between four seemingly true beliefs about the relative value of populations.
==The paradox==

Consider the four populations depicted in the following diagram: A, A+, B− and B. Each bar, within a population, represents a distinct group of people, whose size is represented by the bar's width and whose happiness is represented by the bar's height. Unlike A and B, A+ and B− are thus complex populations, comprising two distinct groups of people. (For simplicity, we might imagine that everyone in a group has exactly the same level of happiness, although this is not essential to the argument. We might instead imagine that the height of a bar represents the average happiness within that group of people.)
How do these four populations compare in value? Let's start by making comparisons between pairs of populations.
First, it seems that A+ is no worse than A. This is because the people in A are no worse off in A+, while the additional people who exist in A+ are better off in A+ compared to A. (Arguably, existence is good for these additional people, assuming that they have lives which are worth living and preferable over non-existence.)
Second, it seems that B− is better than A+. This is because B− has greater total and average happiness than A+.
Finally, B seems equally as good as B− as the only difference between B− and B is that the two groups in B− are merged to form one group in B.
Put together, these three comparisons entail that B is better than A. (If y is no worse than z and x is better than y it follows that x is better than z.) However, when we directly compare A and B, it may seem that B is in fact worse than A.
Thus, we have a paradox—the mere addition paradox—because the following intuitively plausible claims are jointly inconsistent: (a) that A+ is no worse than A, (b) that B− is better than A+, (c) that B− is equally as good as B, and (d) that B is worse than A.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Mere addition paradox」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.